KAB. ACEH SINGKIL
345th out of 514
Results for KAB. ACEH SINGKIL
- Regency
- ACEH
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://regionalgovscorecard.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8-1.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. ACEH SINGKIL
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
0.04
Accountability
0.03
Financial Management
-0.12
Public Service
0.27
Technology and Innovation
-0.02
Inputs
-0.18
Financial Resources
-0.22
Human Resources
-0.14
Performance
-0.04
Attracting Investment
-0.13
Economic Prosperity
-0.08
Employment
0.15
Income & Poverty
-0.07
Education
0.11
Health
-0.23
Gender Equality
-0.13
Environmental Quality
0.05
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.02
Geographic Condition
0.41
Capabilities
203rd
Accountability
254th
Financial Management
423rd
Public Service
39th
Technology and Innovation
286th
Inputs
424th
Financial Resources
457th
Human Resources
352nd
Performance
397th
Attracting Investment
506th
Economic Prosperity
369th
Employment
82nd
Income & Poverty
400th
Education
63rd
Health
464th
Gender Equality
429th
Environmental Quality
201st
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
288th
Geographic Condition
443rd
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
