KAB. GORONTALO
444th out of 514
Results for KAB. GORONTALO
- Regency
- GORONTALO
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://regionalgovscorecard.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8-1.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. GORONTALO
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.17
Accountability
-0.31
Financial Management
-0.05
Public Service
-0.24
Technology and Innovation
-0.06
Inputs
-0.09
Financial Resources
-0.07
Human Resources
-0.11
Performance
-0.09
Attracting Investment
-0.11
Economic Prosperity
-0.01
Employment
-0.09
Income & Poverty
-0.19
Education
0.00
Health
-0.25
Gender Equality
-0.05
Environmental Quality
0.00
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.00
Geographic Condition
0.79
Capabilities
449th
Accountability
468th
Financial Management
343rd
Public Service
441st
Technology and Innovation
330th
Inputs
311th
Financial Resources
301st
Human Resources
319th
Performance
464th
Attracting Investment
460th
Economic Prosperity
273rd
Employment
371st
Income & Poverty
463rd
Education
257th
Health
466th
Gender Equality
320th
Environmental Quality
274th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
460th
Geographic Condition
33rd
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
