KAB. ACEH UTARA
192nd out of 514
Results for KAB. ACEH UTARA
- Regency
- ACEH
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://regionalgovscorecard.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8-1.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. ACEH UTARA
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.14
Accountability
-0.12
Financial Management
0.02
Public Service
-0.22
Technology and Innovation
-0.22
Inputs
0.22
Financial Resources
0.20
Human Resources
0.23
Performance
-0.01
Attracting Investment
-0.03
Economic Prosperity
-0.10
Employment
0.16
Income & Poverty
-0.04
Education
0.15
Health
0.01
Gender Equality
-0.12
Environmental Quality
-0.11
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.01
Geographic Condition
0.42
Capabilities
422nd
Accountability
362nd
Financial Management
234th
Public Service
431st
Technology and Innovation
448th
Inputs
75th
Financial Resources
91st
Human Resources
68th
Performance
332nd
Attracting Investment
213th
Economic Prosperity
399th
Employment
78th
Income & Poverty
359th
Education
30th
Health
285th
Gender Equality
421st
Environmental Quality
404th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
345th
Geographic Condition
439th
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
